Next step · Thailand

CERØ handles the DTV visa, Thai tax residency setup and your home-country exit — end to end. Talk to the team about your specific numbers.

FAQ

Did Thailand actually start taxing all foreign crypto income in 2024?

No, and the headline that circulated globally was an over-simplification. The Thai Revenue Department issued two orders — Por.161/2566 (September 2023, effective from the 2024 tax year) and Por.162/2566 (November 2023) — that clarified and slightly tightened the existing remittance regime. The rule remains: foreign-source income (including foreign crypto gains) is taxed in Thailand only if remitted into Thailand by a Thai tax resident in the same tax year the income arose. The 2024 change closed the prior loophole that allowed remittance in a later tax year to escape Thai tax. It did not introduce taxation of un-remitted foreign income.

What is Por.161 and what changed in 2024?

Por.161/2566 is the Revenue Department instruction stating that any Thai tax resident who has assessable foreign income from 1 January 2024 onwards must include it in their Thai tax return for the year of remittance, regardless of when the income was earned. Before 2024 the dominant interpretation was that foreign income earned in year X and remitted in year X+1 (or later) was outside the Thai tax net — the "year of earning" loophole. From 2024 the rule is the year of remittance only. Foreign income earned before 1 January 2024 and remitted in 2024 or later remains under the pre-2024 rules (Por.162 grandfathering).

What is Por.162 grandfathering?

Por.162/2566 is the follow-up order that confirms foreign income earned before 1 January 2024 is grandfathered under the old rules — i.e. it is outside the Thai tax net if remitted in a later year than the year earned. For crypto founders, this means gains realised on positions held before 2024 and remitted in 2026 or later are not taxable in Thailand under Por.162. The practical effect is a clean line: anything you held pre-2024, you can remit freely; anything realised from 2024 onwards must be tracked against the remittance-year rule.

How does Por.161 actually apply to crypto held offshore?

The rule applies to the act of remittance into Thailand, not to the act of realisation offshore. A Thai tax resident who realises a USDT gain on Binance in 2026, keeps the USDT in Binance for the rest of 2026, and remits the THB equivalent to a Thai bank in 2027 — the gain was earned in 2026 and remitted in 2027, so under Por.161 it is taxable in Thailand in 2027. A founder who realises the same gain in 2026 and never remits it to Thailand (keeps it offshore, spends offshore, lives off other resources) — no Thai tax, ever. A founder who realises the gain in 2026 and remits the same year — taxable in 2026 in Thailand at progressive rates.

Does selling on Bitkub or Orbix count as foreign-source?

No. Selling on Bitkub, Orbix or Bitazza is Thai-source income because the exchange is Thai-licensed and the disposal happens on Thai soil. Thai-source gains are taxable in Thailand at progressive personal income tax rates, with the exchange reporting to the Revenue Department. The territorial-by-remittance regime applies to foreign-source income — disposals on Binance, Kraken, Coinbase or self-custody outside Thailand. The distinction matters for how you architect your stack: keep the main book offshore for the remittance optimisation, route only a small operating float through Thai exchanges for THB spending.

What about stablecoins — are they treated differently from BTC or ETH?

Not under Thai tax law. A USDT or USDC realisation is the same category of foreign-source income as a BTC or ETH realisation, taxed under the same Por.161 remittance-year rule. The practical difference is volatility and on-ramp ease: stablecoins compress USD-equivalent value for transit across the border, removing the price-fluctuation question that affects BTC remittance. But the tax treatment is identical. The 2024 clarifications did not introduce a stablecoin-specific category.

Does the DTV change any of this?

The DTV is immigration status, not tax status. Holding a DTV does not by itself make you Thai tax resident, and does not by itself trigger any remittance rule. The remittance regime applies to anyone who is Thai tax resident (180+ days in Thailand in a calendar year). A DTV holder who spends fewer than 180 days in Thailand in a year is not Thai tax resident for that year, and Por.161 does not apply to their remittances for that year. A DTV holder who spends 200 days is Thai tax resident for that year and Por.161 applies in full.

Can a tax treaty override the Por.161 rule?

Sometimes, and the answer is income-type specific. Thailand has double-tax treaties with most major source countries (EU members, US, UK). For passive income types — interest, certain dividends, certain royalties — the treaty may allocate primary taxing rights to the residence state (Thailand) with a treaty-rate withholding at source. For active business income and most crypto-related gains, the treaty typically allocates taxing rights to the residence state, with credit relief for source-state tax. The treaty does not exempt remittance under Por.161; it determines which country has the primary taxing right and at what rate, with treaty-credit mechanics applied at the Thai filing.